雅思大作文7分範文及解析：利用動物滿足人類利益

雙邊類大作文，環境類話題

Some people claim that it is acceptable to use animals for the benefit of human beings, while others argue that it is wrong to use animals for human purposes. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

題目來源：2013年4月18日大陸雅思大作文

1、題目大意

有些人聲稱，為(wei) 了人類的利益而利用動物是可以接受的，而另一些人則認為(wei) 人類利用動物是錯誤的。討論雙方觀點並給出自己觀點。

2、思路解析

這是一道雙邊類大作文，討論的是人類利用動物是否合理。雙邊類的題目，需要對每個(ge) 觀點分別表達同意或反對，最終的結論就是我的立場，可以是中立（雙方都同意或都反對），也可以是單邊支持某一方立場。審題時注意一點，利用動物是為(wei) 了“the benefit of human beings”，不牽扯別的目的和情況。下麵月半鴨和大家一起來看下具體(ti) 觀點。

首先來看合理的原因，有兩(liang) 方麵。

一是在醫學領域方麵，人類在研究新的藥物時，需要進行大量實驗來觀察藥物效果或者可能存在的副作用，而將研究中的藥物直接用在活人身上無疑更加殘忍且違背倫(lun) 理的行為(wei) ，因此，通過動物來進行研究是相對合理的。

二是人類本身作為(wei) 雜食動物，需要通過食用肉類來果腹以及獲取所需營養(yang) ，因此人類捕獲動物本身符合食物鏈的自然法則。

然後來看認為(wei) 錯誤的原因，可以有三點。

一方麵，在非必要範圍中，人們(men) 依舊會(hui) 利用甚至殺害動物來滿足自身利益。比如大量捕獵機構、大象，僅(jin) 是為(wei) 了獲取機構角和象牙來作為(wei) 裝飾品。這種非必要的需求，卻導致許多野生動物瀕臨(lin) 滅絕，無疑是殘忍的。

另一方麵，在一些領域有更好替代品的前提下，依然通過傷(shang) 害動物來滿足人們(men) 需求，不應得到支持。比如在有大量實驗數據的積累的情況下，依然不斷進行重複的動物實驗。或是在服飾製作時，有更好的天然原材料卻依然殺害動物為(wei) 了獲取毛皮等原材料。

最後，在大自然角度來說

3、提綱

雅思大作文7分範文及解析：利用動物滿足人類利益（附2022年寫(xie) 作預測領取）

4、高分範文示例

In an effort to improve our living conditions, people have experimented with a range of treatments, items, and procedures over the years. Animal testing probably dates back millennia, yet it remains a controversial topic in modern society. This essay will attempt to provide an overview of scenarioses in which animal experiments may be acceptable or inappropriate.

On the one hand, defenders of animal research believe that major advances in battling diseases, infections, and other ailments would not have been achievable without animal research. This is because testing products on healthy humans is inhumane, and computer modelling to predict reactions is a relatively new technology that is not as reliable as animal testing. Without animal testing, medical advancements would have been inconceivable, and the majority of individuals would agree that the sacrifice was worthwhile.

Opponents argue, on the other hand, that studies undertaken simply for cosmetic goals do not justify the use of innocent animals. This is mostly due to two factors: first, it is believed that a substantial body of knowledge has been gathered from previous studies; and second, there are alternatives, such as dermatological testing and the use of natural components. For example, retail companies such as Lush and The Body Shop have gained millions by marketing themselves as natural alternatives to animal research. In view of the ultimate purpose of animal testing and the available alternatives, it is apparent that animal experimentation in this circumstance is completely unethical.

In conclusion, if the situation poses a risk to humans and computer-based alternatives are unavailable, it would be ethical to do animal tests. However, the killing of animals is deeply immoral when research is driven by weak grounds and acceptable alternatives exist.

5、相關(guan) 詞匯和語法結構

controversial 有爭(zheng) 議的

circumstances 情況

advocates 支持者

viruses 病毒

breakthroughs 突破

opponents 反對者

cosmetic 化妝品

innocent 無辜的

alternatives 替代品

dermatological testing 皮膚醫學測試

natural ingredients 自然原料