雅思大作文7分範文及解析：政府和企業解決環境汙染

觀點類大作文，環境類話題

The environmental problems facing today's world are so great that there is little ordinary people can do to improve the situation. Government and large companies should be responsible for reducing the amount of damage being done to the environment. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

題目來源：2009年10月13日大陸雅思大作文

1、題目大意

當今世界麵臨(lin) 的環境問題如此嚴(yan) 重，普通人幾乎無能為(wei) 力來改善這種狀況。政府和大公司應該負責減少對環境造成的破壞。你是否同意？

2、思路解析

這是一道觀點類大作文，聊的是誰應對環境負責的問題。環境保護是個(ge) 很經典的話題，一般在討論時無非就是個(ge) 人、企業(ye) 和政府分別能做什麽(me) ，這道題目在審題時需要注意一點，“there is little ordinary people can do to improve the situation.”也是觀點的一部分，在同意與(yu) 否時需要對其進行論證。下麵，王珍老師和大家一起來看下具體(ti) 觀點。

首先來看同意的角度，有兩(liang) 方麵。

一方麵政府和大型企業(ye) 擁有更多資源和權力，能製定和執行有利於(yu) 環境保護的政策和措施。例如，政府可以通過立法減少工業(ye) 排放，推廣可再生能源，而且隻有政府有權製定和執行環保法規。大公司則可以投資綠色技術，改進生產(chan) 過程減少汙染。這些行為(wei) 對環境的正麵影響遠大於(yu) 個(ge) 人能做的。

另一方麵企業(ye) 是汙染的主要產(chan) 生來源，多數汙染都來自於(yu) 工業(ye) 生產(chan) 過程中產(chan) 生的廢氣、廢水及廢料，而企業(ye) 從(cong) 生產(chan) 過程中獲益，因此應當承擔減少汙染的主要責任。

再來看反對的角度，有三方麵。

一是主要依靠企業(ye) 並不現實。企業(ye) 的決(jue) 策優(you) 先考慮經濟利益而非環境保護，這意味著他們(men) 可能不會(hui) 優(you) 先考慮環境問題，除非這些問題直接影響到他們(men) 的利潤。因此，依賴他們(men) 單方麵采取行動可能會(hui) 忽視了環境保護的緊迫性和重要性。

二是普通人的作用不可忽略。每個(ge) 人的日常行為(wei) 累和態度累積起來對環境有顯著影響。例如，減少使用一次性塑料產(chan) 品、合理利用資源、使用公共交通替代私家車，雖然單個(ge) 行動影響有限，但如果大多數人都這樣做，就能顯著減少對環境的負擔。並且公眾(zhong) 對環境問題的關(guan) 注可以對政府和企業(ye) 產(chan) 生壓力，促使他們(men) 采取更積極的環保措施。

三是環境保護是全球性問題，需要多方共同努力。雖然政府可以製定政策和宣傳(chuan) 環保重要性，但普通人的參與(yu) 和支持同樣不可或缺，所有政策都需要每一個(ge) 個(ge) 體(ti) 付出行動才能產(chan) 生實際效果。

3、提綱

4、高分範文示例

Environmental calamities such as global warming and acid rain loom ominously, casting a dark shadow on the future of human existence. some citizens grapple with feelings of insignificance, doubting their individual capacity to bring about change, while others champion the cause for governmental and corporate intervention to mitigate environmental harm. Personally, addressing this environmental exigency necessitates an amalgamation of efforts from not just the government and corporations, but also ordinary individuals.

Undeniably, the mantle of environmental stewardship falls heavily upon the shoulders of governments and corporations. Governments wield a mighty sword of regulation, capable of curtailing practices detrimental to the environmental equilibrium. To illustrate, they can levy punitive taxes on pollution-rich factories, thereby deterring them from further tarnishing our air, water, and soil. Moreover, with their vast reserves of public funds, governments possess the means to mend the wounds inflicted on our ecosystem. As a testament to this, China, each year, dedicates a substantial budget to counteract the scourge of deforestation nationwide. Similarly, corporations, the Goliaths of the business world, have an inherent duty to address environmental concerns. Their social contract mandates them to operate sustainably, a notion underscored by the expectation for chemical plants, for example, to minimize waste through the utilization of recycled materials and the integration of sewage disposal systems.

Yet, the responsibility to defend the environment extends beyond the halls of government and corporate boardrooms to the realm of ordinary citizens. Though the ripple of change created by a single individual might appear minute, when multiplied by the collective power of humanity, it can stir a tidal wave capable of rectifying our environmental woes. To elucidate, if consumers opt for products with minimal packaging, we stand to conserve a mountain of paper and a sea of plastic. Similarly, if commuters favor public transportation over personal vehicles, we could significantly reduce the volume of exhaust fumes tainting our atmosphere, thereby alleviating the greenhouse effect. Inaction, however, would only serve to accelerate the environmental decay we witness with each passing day.

In summary, while the onus of preserving a clean environment predominantly lies with governments and corporations, the notion that individuals are impotent to instigate change is a fallacy. Rather, we should strive for a symphony of efforts, where every stakeholder plays their part, to salvage our environment and thus secure a more hospitable home for humanity.

5、相關(guan) 詞匯和語法結構

environmental calamities 環境災難

feelings of insignificance 無足輕重的感覺

environmental stewardship 環境管理權

wield a mighty sword of regulation 揮舞強大的規範之劍

detrimental to the environmental equilibrium 對環境平衡有害

punitive taxes 懲罰性稅收

scourge of deforestation 森林砍伐的禍害

inherent duty 固有職責

social contract 社會(hui) 契約

ripple of change 改變的漣漪

collective power of humanity 人類的集體(ti) 力量

alleviate the greenhouse effect 緩解溫室效應

environmental decay 環境衰退

onus of preserving 保存的責任

a fallacy 一個(ge) 謬論

secure a more hospitable home for humanity 為(wei) 人類確保一個(ge) 更適宜的家園