5.11大陸雅思大作文8分範文及解析：所有國家減少能源消耗

觀點類大作文，環境類話題

The international community should act immediately to ensure that all countries reduce their consumption of fossil fuels, such as gas and oil. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

題目來源：2024年5月11日大陸雅思大作文（重複2019年10月19日大陸考題）

1、題目大意

國際社會(hui) 應立即采取行動，確保所有國家減少天然氣和石油等化石燃料的消耗。你是否同意？

2、思路解析

這是一道觀點類大作文，聊的是是否讓全球所有國家減少化石能源的使用。題目理解上不難，特別是有關(guan) 注過近兩(liang) 年國際上環保議題的同學應該很容易想到論點。審題上注意兩(liang) 點，一是題目觀點中有絕對詞“all countries”，一般遇到絕對化的觀點從(cong) 反對角度切入更容易。二是這道題目討論的主體(ti) 對象是“國家”，因此要從(cong) 國家層麵考慮這個(ge) 問題，不要和個(ge) 人搞混了。下麵，王珍老師帶大家一起來看下具體(ti) 觀點。

首先來看同意的角度，主要有兩(liang) 方麵。

首先環境保護是個(ge) 全球化的問題，需要全球各國的共同努力。化石燃料的燃燒是全球溫室氣體(ti) 排放的主要來源，這些氣體(ti) 是導致全球氣候變暖的關(guan) 鍵因素。國際社會(hui) 采取緊急行動可以有效減少溫室氣體(ti) 排放，緩解全球變暖趨勢，保護生態係統，例如減少極地冰川的融化和海平麵上升的風險。

其次，可以推動可持續能源發展。強製各國減少化石燃料消費可以促進清潔、可再生能源技術的研發和使用，如太陽能、風能等。長遠看，這將有助於(yu) 全球能源供應的多樣化和能源安全，減少對單一能源依賴所帶來的經濟和政策風險。

再來看反對的角度，可以重點放在國家之間的區別，不能一概而論，有三方麵。

一是會(hui) 帶來經濟成本與(yu) 發展挑戰，這種能源政策的轉變需要時間和巨額投資，對於(yu) 經濟較弱或正處於(yu) 發展階段的國家來說，可能會(hui) 嚴(yan) 重阻礙其經濟發展和工業(ye) 化進程。對於(yu) 許多依賴化石燃料的國家，尤其是資源型經濟體(ti) ，突然減少化石燃料消費可能導致經濟動蕩，失業(ye) 率上升和能源價(jia) 格飆升。

二是技術和基礎設施限製。雖然可再生能源技術正在進步，但在全球範圍內(nei) 替代化石燃料仍麵臨(lin) 巨大挑戰。許多國家缺乏投資可再生能源的技術和基礎設施，比如在儲(chu) 能和電網現代化方麵存在短板，這可能使得立刻轉變能源結構變得不切實際。

三是政策執行的複雜性，國際社會(hui) 強製所有國家減少化石燃料消費可能麵臨(lin) 執行難題，比如國家主權的衝(chong) 突、政策接受度低、以及不同國家之間的經濟利益和政治立場的差異。這可能導致國際關(guan) 係緊張或合作困難。

3、提綱

5.11大陸雅思大作文8分範文及解析：所有國家減少能源消耗

4、高分範文示例

With rising concerns about energy consumption and environmental issues, attention is turning to the structure of energy use in the modern world. I believe it is unrealistic to expect all nations to change their traditional energy practices in the short term, given the unique circumstances of each country.

Indeed, transitioning from fossil fuels to renewable energy may be feasible for some developed countries. From the perspective of these mature economies, primary concerns include air pollution and the preservation of unsustainable natural resources. In this sense, the shift to renewable energy appears to be a fundamental solution that addresses both issues. Additionally, these affluent regions have the capability to implement such changes, as their economies can withstand the substantial costs associated with redeveloping energy infrastructure, such as building non-coal-burning power plants. Even politicians in these countries can contribute to promoting this energy revolution: voters who dislike breathing smog will support cleaner energy sources.

However, the approach to energy transition suitable for industrialized countries does not automatically apply to less developed nations, due to practical difficulties. Unlike their wealthier counterparts, developing countries are not primarily concerned with the depletion of unsustainable resources or the color of the sky. Instead, their main concern is achieving high national GDP at the lowest energy cost. Given this, I see no incentive for these emerging economies to adopt renewable energy if it requires significant investment in updating energy facilities and increasing manufacturing costs. Moreover, a lack of motivation and a stronger argument against updating energy systems is the shortage of state budgets, which makes it nearly impossible for these poorer countries to move away from traditional fuels.

In conclusion, while it is reasonable for affluent regions to reduce dependence on fossil fuels, I believe it is neither justifiable nor practical to expect less developed countries to take the same measures in the short term.

5、相關(guan) 詞匯和語法結構

energy consumption能源消耗

environmental apprehension環境憂慮

traditional ways of energy usage傳(chuan) 統的能源使用方式

specific circumstance特定情況

mature economies成熟經濟體(ti)

preservation of unsustainable natural resources不可持續自然資源的保護

transition to new energy向新能源過渡

fundamental solution根本解決(jue) 方案

redevelopment of infrastructures基礎設施的重建

non-coal burning power plants非煤燃料發電廠

promoting energy revolution促進能源革命