今天推送的是3月1日·托福·考題分析.以下思路和範文僅(jin) 供同學們(men) 學習(xi) ·參考。
第一套
難度：中等
綜合寫(xie) 作回憶
綜合閱讀：柏樹的根上長的knees的作用：1.在空氣中吸收氧氣 2.提供額外支持力 3.向空氣中排放甲烷聽力：1.科學家實驗 吧knees放在罐子裏氧氣濃度沒有變化 2.knees長在平行根上無支撐力 3.甲烷對樹無害。@175期I..
學術討論寫(xie) 作
教授
This week, we discussed the importance of role models and opinion makers in society. One idea we discussed was the widespread impact of "influencers." Influencers are people who are very active posting on social media and who have many followers. Influencers' posts and opinions can influence their followers' choices on everything from fashion to politics.In your opinion, do social media influencers generally have a positive or negative effect on their followers? Why do you think so?
Kelly:I think the influencers' effect is generally positive. People can learn about the latest trends and topics in a very quick and efficient way by following influencers. In the past, people had to spend time looking through magazines or visiting boutiques to even know what was trending.
Paul:I think influencers generally have a negative effect because they have far too much influence. I can think of one influencer who only has to mention a particular kind of sports shoe, and the next day they'll be sold out. The followers aren't really thinking for themselves; they're just blindly following the influencers' choices.
審題注意點:
二. 題目閱讀：
教授內(nei) 容：回顧之前學習(xi) 重點。
-->引入本節課討論重點：網紅influencers 的影響
-->解釋了網紅influencers的定義(yi) :在社交媒體(ti) 上很活躍+有很多粉絲(si) 。
-->influencers的影響:影響粉絲(si) 的很多選擇，包括穿著和政治。
--> 提出問題:網紅對粉絲(si) 的影響是積極的，還是消極的？
總的來說，教授的內(nei) 容一般都是很工整的：回顧+引入話題/話題定義(yi) 解釋+提出問題.
三. 題目是一個(ge) 二選一，大家選擇一邊倒同意. 也可以 同意+踩對方.
四. 其他2位同學角度：
Kelly:積極. 因為(wei) 讓人很快地知道現在的潮流trends、話題topics . + 【對比】以前，需要花很長時間看報紙，逛店.
👩🏻🏫Eva說：Kelly 的觀點比較簡單和正麵.展開通過對比or舉(ju) 例也很容易。大家可以采納。比如，很多fashion blogger時尚博主，科技博主等. 讓我知道了最新的趨勢，購買(mai) 到了滿意的產(chan) 品。
Paul:消極. 因為(wei) 影響太大了。【舉(ju) 例】有一位網紅提到了一款球鞋，結果第二天就賣光了，因為(wei) 粉絲(si) 隻是無腦跟隨/被“割韭菜”.(The followers aren’t really thinking for themselves; they are just blindly following the influencers’ choices.)
👩🏻🏫Eva說：Paul的觀點理由其實說得有些隱晦。從(cong) 後麵的例子中大家可以反推，是網紅影響力太大了，導致粉絲(si) 購買(mai) 了自己根本不需要的產(chan) 品。所以他們(men) 這麽(me) 大的影響力是有害的。這主要是從(cong) -廣告/推銷/錢-的角度來分析.
建議大家同意Paul說的觀點，闡述清晰一些：
1. 他們(men) 的影響是消極的。因為(wei) 他們(men) 會(hui) 偷偷接一些廣告/資助，宣傳(chuan) 一些根本不實用的產(chan) 品，導致粉絲(si) 無腦購買(mai) ，浪費錢. 比如…(這裏可以使用寫(xie) 作團的語料: (when people see clothes, cosmetics, a car, or a holiday being plugged by someone they admire and respect, they might be swayed into buying it. )
其他可行的觀點：
1. 錯誤言論影響人：因為(wei) 網紅可能famous for nothing/以不知道什麽(me) 原因就火起來了。他們(men) 本身並沒有什麽(me) 特別智慧，也並不是什麽(me) 領域的專(zhuan) 家。所以他們(men) 的很多言論，建議，尤其是生活，政治方麵的，就是錯誤的，對粉絲(si) 有很大的誤導性，造成嚴(yan) 重的傷(shang) 害。比如,卡戴珊家族等提倡不吃碳水減肥…
參考範文：
思路：我認為(wei) 是個(ge) 好影響。因為(wei) 人們(men) 生活很忙，當購買(mai) 商品的時候沒那麽(me) 多時間去仔細充分了解產(chan) 品，所以關(guan) 注一些相關(guan) 的專(zhuan) 業(ye) 的influencers，看他們(men) 的介紹和推薦，可以非常快地選擇適合自己的產(chan) 品。 所以是總的來說是個(ge) 好影響。
參考範文：
I align myself with Kelly’s argument that influencers have a beneficial impact on their followers.This is due to the time-saving benefit their recommendations provide. Living in a fast-paced world, individuals struggle tokeep up with the latest trends, products, and ideas.That's where influencerscome into the picture.Take, for instance, a time when I needed a new computer for work purposes.I sought advice from a professional tech Vlogger. In one of his videos, he offered comprehensive analysis of the popular computers in the market, rating them based on a variety of aspects like functionality and performance. Relying on his expertise saved me considerable time and energy that would have been spent on doing the research myself. I chose the MacBook, which turned out to be light enough to carry around and user-friendly enough for my needs as a frequent traveler.In conclusion,the ability of influencers to attract millions of followers is due to their expertise in their respective fields. Their deep understanding of these fields empowers followers to make wise decisions, saving them time and effort.This demonstrates the invaluable role of influencers in our busy modern lives.
第2套
整體(ti) 難度：難
綜合寫(xie) 作回憶
暫缺歡迎同學們(men) 在下方留言區補充.
學術討論寫(xie) 作
教授This week, we will be discussing space exploration. Some people think that it is a waste of money for governments to fund space exploration. Others disagree with this view arguing that space exploration is a valuable and necessary investment for our future. They think that it is worthy for governments to fund space exploration. I want to know what you think about this topic. Do you think that governments should fund space exploration? Why or why not?
Kelly:I don't think that governments should fund space exploration because it will be too costly to build spaceships and develop related technologies. Though space exploration tech costs billions, it doesn't offer direct benefits to most people, which makes its funding a controversial issue.
Andrew:Personally, I do think that all the costs will be worth it. The potential scientific discoveries and technological advancements could have far-reaching impacts that justify the initial investment. Imagine the new inventions that might come from this exploration. Such technology could greatly improve our everyday lives.
審題注意點:
這一套考題還中了我們(men) 閱讀團的一篇原題。
1.這道題重複了今年2月5日海外場原題。比較有難度.
2. 題目翻譯:
教授：本周我們(men) 將討論太空探索。有人認為(wei) 政府資助太空探索是浪費金錢。然而，也有人持不同觀點，認為(wei) 太空探索是對我們(men) 未來有價(jia) 值和必要的投資。他們(men) 認為(wei) 政府應該資助太空探索。我想知道你對這個(ge) 話題有什麽(me) 看法。你認為(wei) 政府應該資助太空探索嗎？為(wei) 什麽(me) 或者為(wei) 什麽(me) 不？
(3). 審題注意點：
1.Do you think that governments should fund space exploration? Why or why not?比較傳(chuan) 統的利弊題型。
2. government fund:聯係團裏講解的政府投資思路/語料。
👩🏻🏫：這個(ge) 題目從(cong) 正麵去寫(xie) space travel的內(nei) 容，需要有大量的知識儲(chu) 備，反而從(cong) 政府角度會(hui) 容易一些。
3. space travel:滿足人類的好奇心。
4. space exploration:比如探索金星，火星上是否有生命，他們(men) 是如何變成現在這樣的。是否有人類需要的資源：能源，空間資源。人類是否可以移民過去….
參考提綱一：
我同意kelly的觀點。探索外太空會(hui) 給政府帶來沉重的經濟負擔。因為(wei) 太空探索需要龐大的資金投入。比如，僅(jin) 僅(jin) 是修造一個(ge) 太空飛船就需要上萬(wan) 的科學家，工程師和工人來多年的投入。 但是，另一方麵，政府的資金是有限的。如果花了大量的資金在太空探索上，就沒有足夠的資金來投入其他更重要，更緊急的項目，比如教育，醫療和就業(ye) 。所以，我覺得這不是一個(ge) 好的政策。
參考提綱二：
我覺得這是一個(ge) 好政策。投資外太空有利於(yu) 現在的人類。比如，很多用於(yu) 太空的科技也可以用於(yu) 現在。比如納米材料，做航天服的材料可以用在極端環境下工作的人類，比如沙漠和極地地區。
參考範文：
I agree with Kelly's perspective that governments should not allocate funds to space exploration.First, these ventures require massive financial investment, often running into billions, which would unduly strain a government's budget.For instance,developing a single advanced spaceship involves the collective expertise of numerous scientists, engineers, and builders, working for years and requiring highly specialized equipment and materials.
Second, the issue of budget constraints.Governments operateon limited budgetsand mustprioritize sectorsthat directly impact the well-being of their citizens,such as education, healthcare, and environmental protection. Allocating significant funds to space projects would inevitably mean reducing investment in these critical areas. This would have real-life implications;for instance,underfunded educational systems could affect the future prospects of young people relying on student loans, and insufficient healthcare could endanger the lives of vulnerable populations.
In conclusion, although space exploration is an exciting endeavor, it should not be a priority for government funding, given the immediate needs and financial constraints faced by most nations.Therefore, it is prudent for governments to defer such ambitious projects until more urgent needs are met.
第3套
綜合寫(xie) 作回憶
歡迎同學們(men) 在下方留言處補充
學術討論寫(xie) 作
教授：We've been discussing the idea that human well-being is notnecessarily improved by ever-increasing production andconsumption of goods and services. Some people arguethat humans already consume too many goods, fromclothing to electronics to food: they believe that excessiveconsumption has created serious problems for humanity andeven the planet. Do you agree that excessive consumption-buying more than we truly need has become a seriousproblem? Why or why not?
Kelly:I absolutely agree. We buy far more than we need, andthat can't continue indefinitely. For years people haveused shopping as a form of recreation. The productsbought on a whim are filling up landfills, and the energyexpended producing the goods has created a globalwarming crisis. We should start gradually reducingconsumption.Andrew:I disagree with the idea that overconsumption is adramatic problem. l agree there is someoverconsumption, but it happens mostly with wealthypeople. l think in general almost everyone else alreadybuys only what they need. In fact, many people aroundthe world are not even able to obtain everything theyneed.
審題注意點:
(1). 這道題重複了24年11月12日的原題。
(2)_“excessive consumption 是個(ge) 嚴(yan) 重的問題”。需要我們(men) 證明/回答的是否是“嚴(yan) 重的問題”.
--如果同意，我們(men) 可以回答是：是嚴(yan) 重的問題的. 因為(wei) 導致了…的惡果.
--如果不同意，我們(men) 可以回答：不是嚴(yan) 重的問題。沒什麽(me) 壞影響。Or 實際上產(chan) 生了好的結果。
(3). “excessive consumption”: 過度/過量消費。
注意，這裏並不是指購買(mai) 正常生活所需要的衣食住行等消費。而是過量了，超出了正常的範疇。比如,雙十一，或者美國“黑色星期五”的時候有很多人囤很多衛生紙巾，護膚品，零食，衣服，視頻app的年卡等等… 這些超出自己目前需要的量，最後可能過期了還沒用完的消費，才算是excessive consumption.當理解了excessive consumption 的核心含義(yi) ，這個(ge) 題目就好寫(xie) 了。(4). 可行的思路
--同意導致了嚴(yan) 重的問題。
(思路1)浪費了大量的資源。現在很多人會(hui) 為(wei) 了省錢discount, 一下子購買(mai) 大量的產(chan) 品。比如很多人在黑色星期五Black Friday 購買(mai) 了一整年量的衛生紙，護膚品，洗發水等… 但是等到過期了還沒用完。這不僅(jin) 造成了物資的嚴(yan) 重浪費，也多花了很多錢。比如我媽媽每年都會(hui) 在black Friday 買(mai) 很多日用品，每年在這一天的開支都達到了1000美元，導致我們(men) 家那個(ge) 月隻能吃三明治做午餐。但是幾乎一大半都沒有使用就被扔掉了。但是如果她在需要的時候才購買(mai) 的話，至少可以少花一半。所以對於(yu) 大部分普通消費者來說，帶來了嚴(yan) 重的浪費。
(思路2)浪費了大量的錢。現在很多人會(hui) 乘著產(chan) 品打折的時候，很衝(chong) 動地購買(mai) 一些自己根本不需要的產(chan) 品因為(wei) 覺得便宜。 比如為(wei) 了旅行使用的大旅行箱，太陽鏡。健身房的年卡。書(shu) 籍… 但是實際上發現自己根本太忙沒有時間去旅遊。平時太累也隻去過一兩(liang) 次的健身房。書(shu) 也沒翻開過… 這些不僅(jin) 浪費了資源，也浪費了很多可以節省下來的錢。
--不同意導致了嚴(yan) 重的問題。
1. 幫助人們(men) 省錢。因為(wei) 大部分產(chan) 品都隻在幾個(ge) 特殊的日子打折銷售，如果人們(men) 抓住這些機會(hui) 購買(mai) 多一些產(chan) 品，就可以節省大量的生活成本。比如在美國black Friday，幾乎所有的產(chan) 品都打5 折。人們(men) 可以省很多錢。
2.過度消費有利於(yu) 刺激經濟發展。這幾年因為(wei) covid-19的影響，全球經濟都在衰退。人民的收入在下降，導致很多人們(men) 不夠購物。失去消費者的工廠也陸續倒閉，更多的人失業(ye) 。刑場惡性循環。所以，如果人們(men) 願意多購買(mai) 一些產(chan) 品，那麽(me) 工廠就會(hui) 有收入，減少失業(ye) ，促進經濟恢複.
👩🏻🏫：雖然這也是一個(ge) 比較好想到的思路。但是, 建議大家在分析的時候，不要想得過於(yu) 宏觀。因為(wei) 這樣觀點太大，對大家的邏輯思維和語言表達能力提升了很高的要求。
參考範文:
Excessive consumption often leads to significant problems, particularly waste.Discount salesare a prevalent tactic for retailers to increase sales.Sales events, like Black Friday in America, exemplify this issue.These sales, offering products at substantially reduced prices, entice customers tomake impulsive purchases. People oftenbuy in bulk,acquiring everything froma year's supply of necessities,such as tissues and oatmeal, to items that are ultimately unnecessary in their lives.
For instance,I recall purchasinga gym membership, only to realize that I lacked the time and energy to utilize it.This experience is not unique;many consumers find that at year's end, much of what they've bought is either expired or superfluous. Such excessive buying leads to not just physical waste, but also financial imprudence. The moneysquanderedon unneeded items could be more wisely spent on essentials or savings.
In conclusion,buying far more than necessary has detrimental effects, making it prudent tobudget expenditures carefully.（159字）
【競賽報名/項目谘詢+微信：mollywei007】
評論已經被關(guan) 閉。