劍11寫作7分範文及解析：Test2 法律是推廣回收利益的唯一途徑

觀點類大作文，環境類話題

People claim that not enough of the waste from home is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for government to make it a legal requirement. To what extent to you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?

題目來源：劍11Test2大作文

1、題目大意

人們(men) 聲稱家裏的廢物沒有得到足夠的回收。他們(men) 認為(wei) 提高回收的唯一方法是政府將其作為(wei) 一項法律規定。你認為(wei) 在多大程度上需要法律來使人們(men) 回收利用廢棄物？

2、思路解析

這是一道觀點類大作文，聊得是廢物回收利用的問題。話題不難理解，審題時候要注意兩(liang) 點，一是觀點中提及的“laws”一定需要展開討論，二是觀點中有絕對詞only way，一般遇到絕對詞我們(men) 從(cong) 反對角度更好切入。下麵月半鴨和大家一起來看下具體(ti) 觀點。

首先來看製定法律的合理性，有兩(liang) 方麵。

一是法律本身具有強製性，對於(yu) 那些不願意進行回收利用的人，可以通過強製手段要求他們(men) 執行。同時，違背法令所會(hui) 麵臨(lin) 的懲罰也會(hui) 讓他們(men) 有所忌憚。

二是製定法律法規後，政府行政機關(guan) 介入可以使得回收利用更快速地得到推廣。

但是這個(ge) 方式會(hui) 給政府帶來額外的財政負擔。法律製定後的實際執行需要投入大量執法者，這些人力成本和時間成本無疑會(hui) 成為(wei) 一種負擔。

然後再來看非唯一辦法的原因，有兩(liang) 方麵。

二是政府可以通過媒體(ti) 宣傳(chuan) 等方式，激發人們(men) 的環保意識，使得更多人願意主動進行廢物利用。相較於(yu) 被動強迫去執行，這樣的效果無疑會(hui) 更加持久。

三是政府可以通過激勵政策，對於(yu) 進行廢物利用的人實施獎勵，比如價(jia) 格抵扣等，來吸引更多人參與(yu) 其中並培養(yang) 良好的習(xi) 慣。

3、提綱

劍11寫(xie) 作7分範文及解析 | Test2 法律是推廣回收利益的唯一途徑

4、高分範文示例

Nowadays, the recycling of household rubbish has become a problem that frustrates and exhausts the general public all over the world. Therefore, it is claimed that the government should legislate to promote the waste recycling. To me, addressing this problem is likely to need more than a simple legal and institutional measure.

Granted, injunctions from the authority do have their advantages in waste management. One of the primary benefit lays emphasis on its deterrent to those reluctant to recycle garbage. With a legalized rule for them to follow, especially with its penalty clarified, they will constrain their conduct out of the fear of being punished for not abiding the law. Another reward brought by the measure appears to be its effectiveness, which is guaranteed by the administrative enforcement in implementation.

However, though the compulsory measure has its role to play in managing waste, it doesn’t mean that there are no other options to promote recycling. In contrast to the punishment mentioned above, awarding policies from business could be made an attractive alternative to government laws. For example, if there were incentives as cash credits or discounts for customers reusing their packages when shopping, more families would like to keep their packaging bags rather than discard them, thus not only stimulating the circulation of disposable bags but also curbing the overproduction of packaging materials. Meanwhile, the public media could strengthen publicity and education, cultivating a consciousness of environmental protection among individuals, thus leading to a self-discipline on their personal behavior. Only by doing so, will the problem be tackled in a more spontaneous way.

In summarize, from what has been discussed above, legal requirement is far from the only way to promote waste recycling, there are plenty of other pragmatic solutions which can lead to an environmental treatment of household rubbish.

5、相關(guan) 詞匯和語法結構

Frustrate 使懊惱 ; 使沮喪(sang)

Exhaust 耗盡 ; 使筋疲力盡

Legislate 製定法律 ; 立法

legal and institutional measure 法律與(yu) 製度措施

Injunctions 強製令，禁製令

Lay emphasis on 重視、強調

Constrain 約束、限製、強迫

Effectiveness 效果、有效性

Guarantee 保證 ; 擔保

Administrative enforcement 行政強製執行

Implementation 實施 ; 執行 ; 貫徹