10.7大陸雅思大作文8分範文及解析：公共場合禁止使用手機

觀點類大作文，科技類話題

Some people think that that mobiles phoness should be banned in public places such as libraries, shops and public transport. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

題目來源：2023年10月7日大陸雅思大作文

1、題目大意

一些人認為(wei) 應該禁止在圖書(shu) 館、商店和公共交通工具等公共場所使用手機。你在多大程度上同意或不同意？

2、思路解析

這是一道觀點類大作文，聊的是禁止使用收集的問題。題目理解上不難，一般遇到這類“禁止”的絕對化觀點，都是持反對角度切入更容易，下麵月半鴨和大家一起來看下具體(ti) 觀點。

首先來看不應在公共場合隨意使用手機的原因，主要有兩(liang) 方麵。

一是公共場合使用手機的噪音會(hui) 打擾到其他人，無論是播放音樂(le) 還是打電話，聲音太大都會(hui) 對身邊人造成困擾，過量的噪音甚至會(hui) 讓人感到煩躁。

二是在一些公共場合比如電影院，手機發出的光亮也會(hui) 幹擾到其他人，讓他們(men) 有不好的消費體(ti) 驗。而為(wei) 了保障其他消費者的權利，商家也會(hui) 反對個(ge) 人在其中使用手機。

然後來看不應完全禁止的原因，同樣有兩(liang) 方麵。

一方麵手機作為(wei) 人們(men) 常用的娛樂(le) 手段，在乘坐公共交通時能夠用來打發時間，同時使用耳機或者調成靜音能夠有效避免發出噪音打擾到其他乘客。在不影響他人的情況下，限製人們(men) 使用手機並沒有意義(yi) 。

另一方麵手機作為(wei) 現在人們(men) 重要的溝通手段，如果遇到緊急的事情，即使在公共場合，當事人也需要聯係他人或者能被聯係上，因此應該保障人們(men) 必要時能夠使用手機的基本權利。

3、提綱

4、高分範文示例

In the contemporary era, mobiles phoness have become an integral part of our daily lives, streamlining communication and offering myriad functions beyond just conversation. However, a growing sentiment suggests that they should be banned in public places such as libraries, shops, and public transport. While I acknowledge the disruptions that mobiles phoness can sometimes cause in such settings, I cannot fully agree with an outright ban, as this disregards their various potential benefits.

On the one hand, the reasons behind the desire to ban mobiles phoness in specific public places are valid. In libraries, for instance, which are traditionally bastions of silence and concentration, a ringing phones or a loud conversation can be incredibly distracting to those immersed in study or reading. Similarly, on public transport, many passengers use this time to relax, read, or even take a nap. A cacophony of ringtones, alarms, or video sounds can significantly disrupt this peaceful interlude. Furthermore, in shops, especially in small or crowded ones, excessive phones usage can impede the flow of customer movement or even lead to mishaps, given the users' divided attention.

However, a more nuanced approach than a complete ban is needed, primarily because of the indispensable role mobiles phoness play in our daily routines. In emergency situations, for instance, quick access to a phones can be life-saving. On public transport, many passengers rely on phoness for tracking their journey to ensure they get off at the right station or stop. Completely banning mobiles phoness might deprive them of this essential aid. Moreover, in the age of digital wallets and e-commerce, many shop transactions occur via mobiles applications. Banning phoness could inadvertently hinder the very nature of modern commerce.

Instead of an outright ban, a more practical solution could be the implementation of strict guidelines and etiquette associated with mobiles phones usage. Libraries could demarcate areas where phones usage is permissible or provide soundproof booths for making urgent calls. Public transport can encourage passengers to use earphoness, and shops can have designated areas or signs reminding customers to be mindful of their surroundings while using their phoness.

In conclusion, while the concerns regarding mobiles phones disruptions in public places are legitimate, an outright ban is not the ideal solution. Emphasizing responsible usage, coupled with the establishment of clear guidelines, can ensure that the convenience mobiles phoness offer is not sacrificed, while also maintaining the sanctity and purpose of public spaces.

5、相關(guan) 詞匯和語法結構

integral part   不可或缺的部分

contemporary era   當代時期

bastions of silence   寧靜的堡壘

cacophony of ringtones   鈴聲的喧囂

divided attention   分散的注意力

indispensable role   不可或缺的角色

emergency situations   緊急情況

route updates   路線更新

digital wallets   數字錢包

outright ban   完全禁止

strict guidelines   嚴(yan) 格的指導方針

responsible usage   負責任的使用