TOEFL 綜合寫作的完整細節是什麽概念?

綜合寫(xie) 作的5分標準要求內(nei) 容的complete & accurate.

但是成績單上我們(men) 也看不到自己的小分,我們(men) 看到的都是30分製的一個(ge) 總分,所以不知道自己的綜合寫(xie) 作有沒有實現滿分。

有一個(ge) 比較簡單的判斷方法是如果總分沒有到28+的,那麽(me) 綜合寫(xie) 作肯定沒有實現滿分,如果是25-28間的,就是細節的完整性有問題。如果是不到25的,那麽(me) 高概率是miss a point 了。

miss a point 相對好判斷,就是3個(ge) 觀點對應的細節有一個(ge) 聽的沒有那麽(me) 好,導致記錄的信息比較少,或者記錄信息的準確度有問題。

但是一個(ge) 25左右同學,想到28+,如果去提高綜合寫(xie) 作的細節完整度呢?

一個(ge) 簡單的例子來說下這篇文章裏的完整度的問題。

59 的綜合寫(xie) 作

文章講的是Laos 發現的 Jars 到底是幹什麽(me) 用的,閱讀提出了3個(ge) 解釋,聽力對於(yu) 3個(ge) 解釋分別反駁。

聽力的文本是這樣的(為(wei) 了呈現上的直觀性,這裏就直接放文本了)

Despite what you just read, the Plain of Jars is actually quite mysterious. The purpose of the jars is still uncertain. 

First, the fermentation theory is probably not true. In Laos pots that are traditionally used to ferment drinks are made of clay. You could use stone jars for fermentation too, but frankly, creating stone jars is difficult. Creating stone containers is much more time consuming and expensive than making containers from clay. Why would ancient people have expended all this effort on creating stone jars for fermentation when clay pots were easier to make and could have served the same purpose just as effectively?

Second, it's unlikely that the jars were created for the purpose of storing water for travelers. Although the jars were located near ancient trade routes, these routes were also close to rivers and streams. People who were traveling near a river probably had no need for an additional source of fresh water, so it's unlikely that the jars would have been used for this purpose.

Third, the large size of the jars and the presence of tools, beads, and jewelry in some jars suggests that the jars may have been used as tombs for burying human remains, but there is one serious problem with this theory. Tombs are usually covered in order to protect the human remains and artifacts that are buried alongside them from the weather, from thieves, and so on. But the stone jars found in the plain of jars do not have any covers. No one has found any type of cover either on the jars themselves or nearby. Without covers to protect the human remains, it's unlikely that the jars were used as tombs.

一共字數是283個(ge) 。

我們(men) 都知道綜合寫(xie) 作的時候聽力細節是很重要的,如果做到最完成,當然是把聽力的內(nei) 容都接收下來。當然這個(ge) 如果可以實現,就沒有必要克製自己,把內(nei) 容都接收下來就好。

隻是一般來說可實現性不高:那麽(me) 下麵簡單標識下接受到了哪些內(nei) 容能到25+;又需要哪些內(nei) 容能到28+

25以上的聽力細節要求 

(以下橘色部分內(nei) 容包含就好)

Despite what you just read, the Plain of Jars is actually quite mysterious. The purpose of the jars is still uncertain. 

First, the fermentation theory is probably not true. In Laos pots that are traditionally used to ferment drinks are made of clay. You could use stone jars for fermentation too, but frankly, creating stone jars is difficult. Creating stone containers is much more time consuming and expensive than making containers from clay. Why would ancient people have expended all this effort on creating stone jars for fermentation when clay pots were easier to make and could have served the same purpose just as effectively?

Second, it's unlikely that the jars were created for the purpose of storing water for travelers. Although the jars were located near ancient trade routes, these routes were also close to rivers and streams. People who were traveling near a river probably had no need for an additional source of fresh water, so it's unlikely that the jars would have been used for this purpose.

Third, the large size of the jars and the presence of tools, beads, and jewelry in some jars suggests that the jars may have been used as tombs for burying human remains, but there is one serious problem with this theory. Tombs are usually covered in order to protect the human remains and artifacts that are buried alongside them from the weather, from thieves, and so on. But the stone jars found in the plain of jars do not have any covers. No one has found any type of cover either on the jars themselves or nearby. Without covers to protect the human remains, it's unlikely that the jars were used as tombs.

28 以上的聽力細節要求

Despite what you just read, the Plain of Jars is actually quite mysterious. The purpose of the jars is still uncertain. 

First, the fermentation theory is probably not true. In Laos pots that are traditionally used to ferment drinks are made of clay. You could use stone jars for fermentation too, but frankly, creating stone jars is difficult. Creating stone containers is much more time consuming and expensive than making containers from clay. Why would ancient people have expended all this effort on creating stone jars for fermentation when clay pots were easier to make and could have served the same purpose just as effectively?

Second, it's unlikely that the jars were created for the purpose of storing water for travelers. Although the jars were located near ancient trade routes, these routes were also close to rivers and streams. People who were traveling near a river probably had no need for an additional source of fresh water, so it's unlikely that the jars would have been used for this purpose.

Third, the large size of the jars and the presence of tools, beads, and jewelry in some jars suggests that the jars may have been used as tombs for burying human remains, but there is one serious problem with this theory. Tombs are usually covered in order to protect the human remains and artifacts that are buried alongside them from the weather, from thieves, and so on. But the stone jars found in the plain of jars do not have any covers. No one has found any type of cover either on the jars themselves or nearby. Without covers to protect the human remains, it's unlikely that the jars were used as tombs.

通過以上的例子是一個(ge) 大致的呈現,如果感覺自己聽力信息接受還OK的,可以試著把類似上麵28+部分的細節也在文中體(ti) 現出來,這樣寫(xie) 作部分的分數就比較穩定了。

【競賽報名/項目谘詢+微信:mollywei007】

上一篇

第31屆全國中學生生物學競賽開幕!2022年首批競賽保送及強基破格資格生即將產生

下一篇

閱讀類的測試考察的到底是什麽能力?

你也可能喜歡

  • 暫無相關文章!

評論已經被關(guan) 閉。

插入圖片
返回頂部