2025-26 WSDA秋季賽公共論壇式辯論辯題公布！

2025 WSDA全國總決(jue) 賽剛剛落下帷幕

但屬於(yu) WSDAer們(men) 的征程從(cong) 不止步

新的賽季，新的辯題，新的挑戰已經在路上！

經過為(wei) 期兩(liang) 周公開激烈的投票，2025-2026賽季WSDA秋季賽

公共論壇式辯論辯題已火熱出爐，並於(yu) 2025 WSDA全國總決(jue) 賽閉幕式上揭曉！

根據由WSDA會(hui) 員投出的有效票數統計，辯題三（Resolved: China should embrace a four-day work week.）最終以43.9%的得票率脫穎而出，獲得了更多WSDAer們(men) 的青睞！

下麵，WSDA賽事組委會(hui) 正式宣布，2025-2026 WSDA秋季賽公共論壇式辯論辯題為(wei) ：

2025-2026 秋季賽

Resolved: "China should embrace a four-day work week.“

中國應推行四天工作製。

01、Topic Analysis

If there’s one thing you can count on in any debate about work schedules, it’s that people have very strong opinions—often based on how tired they are at that exact moment. The idea of shifting to a four-day work week has been gaining steam globally, and now it’s on the table for China. This topic asks us to think about whether such a change makes sense for the Chinese context—economically, socially, and culturally.

Framing the Debate

The key to this topic is that the resolution uses the word “embrace,” which means we’re not just talking about trial programs or optional participation. The affirmative must defend a general move toward a four-day work week, while the negative defends sticking with the traditional five (or more) workdays. The “should” means we’re arguing ought, not will, so the clash will be about benefits and harms rather than political feasibility.

Core Issues to Consider

When breaking this topic down, most arguments will land in one of three buckets:

1.Economic Productivity– Will fewer days of work lead to the same (or better) output, or will it drag down the economy?

• Pro side:Global pilots in countries like Iceland, Belgium, and Japan have shown that shorter weeks can boost productivity per hour, reduce burnout, and improve retention.
• Con side:Critics worry that China’s manufacturing-heavy industries and fast-moving tech sectors depend on high total work hours, and losing a day could mean missed deadlines or reduced competitiveness.

2.Worker Well-being– This is where quality of life comes into play.

• Pro side:More rest means healthier, happier employees. This could translate into lower healthcare costs, less turnover, and stronger family and community life.
• Con side:Compressing the same workload into fewer days can create more stressful, longer daily hours, negating the intended benefits.

3.Cultural and Structural Fit– A four-day week might sound great in theory, but does it fit China’s business culture and economic structure?

• Pro side:China’s growing service and knowledge economy could adapt, especially in urban centers where flexible work arrangements are more feasible.
• Con side:Many small businesses, factories, and customer-facing roles can’t simply “skip” a day without losing business or creating backlogs.

02、PRO Strategy

An effective Pro case will likely argue that:

• The four-day week is already working in diverse economies and can be adapted to China’s context.
• Productivity per hour matters more than total hours, and modern tools make this possible.
• Worker health and morale directly boosts long-term economic growth.
• A shorter work week can also encourage innovation, attract top talent, and align with trends in sustainable economic development.

03、CONStrategy

On the flip side, the Con might:

• Emphasize that China’s economy is unique in scale and structure—global pilots might not translate well.
• Argue that certain sectors (logistics, manufacturing, retail) can’t easily function with fewer days without major economic disruption.
• Point out that job security and wages could be at risk if hours are cut without guaranteed pay adjustments.
• Highlight that cultural norms about hard work and availability could make adoption uneven and divisive.

04、Key Definitions to Consider

• Four-day work week:Does it mean 32 hours total or just condensing 40+ hours into four days? This is hugelyimportant, because the impacts differ.
• Embrace:Does it mean full national adoption or strong governmental encouragement?
• Productivity:Are we measuring output per hour, per day, or total output?

05、Potential Clash Points

• Output vs. Hours:Which is more important for economic success?
• Short-Term vs. Long-Term Gains:Will the adjustment period cause disruptions that outweigh the benefits?
• Uniform vs. Flexible Adoption:Should all industries change, or only those where it makes sense?

06、Final Thoughts

This is a fun topic because both sides have strong, real-world evidence to work with. The best debates will avoid just trading “it worked in Iceland” vs. “China is different” soundbites and instead dig into what conditions make a four-day work week succeed or fail. Whether you’re Pro or Con, remember: this isn’t just about a day off—it’s about redefining what productivity, balance, and growth look like in a rapidly changing economy.

辯手們(men) ，準備好迎接全新的思維碰撞了嗎？全新辯題、全新舞台、全新征途正在向你招手！2025-26 秋季賽報名通道即將開啟讓我們(men) 在新賽季的賽場上

再一次見證你閃耀的瞬間！