雙邊類大作文,工作類話題
Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
題目來源:劍17Test3大作文
題目大意
一些人認為(wei) 專(zhuan) 業(ye) 人士比如醫生和工程師應該在接受培訓的國家工作,其他人認為(wei) 他們(men) 有自由選擇工作國家的權利,討論雙方觀點並給出自己的觀點。
思路解析
這是一道雙邊類大作文,討論的是專(zhuan) 業(ye) 人士應該在哪工作的問題。雙邊類的題目,需要對每個(ge) 觀點分別表達同意或反對,最終的結論就是我的立場,可以是中立(雙方都同意或都反對),也可以是單邊支持某一方立場。審題時要注意兩(liang) 個(ge) 限定對象一是“doctors and engineers”,要考慮這些職業(ye) 的特性;二是“the country where they did their training”,比如接受培訓的國家和祖國就是兩(liang) 個(ge) 概念,如果把愛國作為(wei) 論點之一就偏題了,因此一定要注意。下麵月半鴨和大家一起來看下具體(ti) 觀點。
首先來看前者觀點的合理性,有三方麵。
一是培養(yang) 醫生、工程師之類的專(zhuan) 業(ye) 人員,往往需要大量的時間和資金的投入。對於(yu) 國家和社會(hui) 來說,自然會(hui) 希望這筆投入能夠獲得相應回報,即培養(yang) 的人才能夠學成後在當地工作發揮作用。
二是一些專(zhuan) 業(ye) 人士的培養(yang) 可能會(hui) 考慮當地的實際需求,比如醫生會(hui) 學習(xi) 如何診斷和治療當地的高發疾病,而他們(men) 學成後投入工作能為(wei) 當地更有針對性地解決(jue) 一些問題。
三是在培養(yang) 過程中可能會(hui) 涉及一些核心技術,一旦相關(guan) 人才畢業(ye) 後選擇去其他國家工作,會(hui) 導致核心技術泄密,威脅到培養(yang) 國的安全。
其次我們(men) 來看“自由選擇工作地點”的合理性,有兩(liang) 方麵。
一是很多學生接受相關(guan) 專(zhuan) 業(ye) 培訓的時候,是支付了相應的費用,因此其並沒有義(yi) 務需要在學成之後額外花費時間和精力來回報當地。(可以用來反駁前麵第一點)。
二是有些地方雖然培養(yang) 了醫生或工程師,但是當地並沒有辦法提供合理的就業(ye) 環境和待遇。因此,有能力的專(zhuan) 業(ye) 人士為(wei) 了自身發展選擇了一個(ge) 更能體(ti) 現價(jia) 值以及獲得高收入的國家去工作無可厚非。
提綱
高分範文示例
Certain groups today argue that skilled professionals should be obliged to work in the same location where they received their initial training, while others feel they are owed the right to work anywhere. Despite the benefits of working in the training country, I believe there should also be a right to self-selection.
There are several reasons why professionals like doctors or engineers should continue their careers in training countries. Firstly, the government has allocated abundant resources to developing skilled and experienced personnel, so that they are expected to pay such an investment back. If these professionals relocate with expertise and cutting-edge knowledge, the training country might face the risk of experiencing a stagnation of technology, social change, or even an economic downturn in the long run. Second, since the development of professionals tends to be guided by a nation’s current needs and circumstances, making them remain in training nations could facilitate local development. To be specific, for the training countries where an outbreak occurs, doctors could efficiently propose targeted treatment strategies, and for those nations facing severe pollution, engineers could utilize the acquired knowledge and come up with practical solutions to reverse the trend.
However, having the freedom to choose one’s place of employment is also paramount. On the one hand, some people pay for their own training courses, so they do not have a duty to contribute to the training country. On the other hand, compared with limiting one’s career prospects within one nation, working abroad tends to offer individuals additional occupational opportunities. For example, medical professionals can obtain and study first-hand information on diseases that are specific to a particular locality. In addition, more research results can be obtained if another country can support professionals with advanced facilities.
Taking all the above into consideration, though working in training countries can bring certain benefits to the training country, professionals should be granted the freedom to choose to work anywhere.
相關(guan) 詞匯和語法結構
invest resources: 投入資源
the current needs and conditions of the country: 國家目前的需求和條件
career prospects: 職業(ye) 前景
first-hand information: 第一手資料
評論已經被關(guan) 閉。